Feb 2026
On Urgency and Clarity
What are you rushing toward, and have you earned the clarity yet?
There's a tension I keep returning to: the need to move fast, and the wisdom to move right. I've spent a long time living inside that tension, not resolving it, but learning to read it. 've always had a strong bias toward action. The moment an idea strikes, I want to make it real. That instinct has carried me far, and I don't take it for granted. But like any strength, it can become a liability when misapplied. Without precision, urgency becomes noise. You sprint, but toward what? And when you hit a wall, do you have the conviction to push through it, or were you running from something all along? Sometimes the better move is not to sprint. It's to sit. To be calculating, patient. Because the fastest way to build something that endures is to slow down just long enough to know what you're building and why.
Preparation is the work
The most iconic creative and technical achievements share a counterintuitive truth: the preparation timeline almost always eclipses the execution timeline.
Jørn Utzon's Sydney Opera House won its design competition in 1957, but it took four years before construction even began—and over a decade just to resolve the engineering behind its sail-like forms. Frank Gehry spent eight years in design development and materials research on the Fondation Louis Vuitton in Paris; the building itself took three. The iPhone was in development for over two years before Jobs ever walked onstage with it. Behind the reveal was a team that had killed multiple prototypes, rewritten the OS from scratch, and debated interaction models obsessively. What looked like a flash of genius was a slow, relentless pursuit of clarity.
Shonda Rhimes talks about spending nine months—nine months—thinking about a script before she sits down to write it. Then she writes it in a day. To the outside world, that's overnight magic. In reality, it's the reward of preparation that looked, to most observers, like nothing at all.
Real clarity leads to accelerated execution. When you've done the foundational work—the conviction-building, the hypothesis-testing, the uncomfortable reckoning with what you're actually trying to say—building becomes an act of expression, not just activity.
This is the part that tends to get skipped. Not because people are lazy, but because invisible work is hard to justify—to employers, to collaborators, and most painfully, to yourself. The discomfort of not yet building can feel indistinguishable from stalling. But incubation isn't delay, it’s quiet dedication.
Urgency vs. impatience
There's a fine line between urgency and impatience, and conflating them is one of the more expensive mistakes a high-agency person can make.
Urgency is fuel. Impatience is fire without direction. Too often, we start things because we can't tolerate the discomfort of waiting—not because the moment is right, but because inaction feels like failure. We reach for the first idea that feels "good enough" rather than the one that truly resonates.
But impatience isn't conviction. Conviction feels like a pull, not a push. It's that instant recognition of a truth so strong it almost burns through you—versus the shallow spark of an idea born out of restlessness. One is orientation. The other is escape.
The best decisions—the ones that actually endure—are rarely made from a place of escape. They're made when two good paths are in front of you. When you're deciding not out of desperation, but from a position of strength and clarity. Impatience often disguises itself as momentum. You jump ship not because you've found something better, but because you're tired of where you are. That's a different thing entirely.
The pressure to start
There's a particular kind of urgency that runs through my generation of founders and operators: the pressure to launch, to move, to be building something at all times. It's not entirely unfounded—speed matters, markets move, and momentum compounds. But that urgency has also created an unrealistic pressure that's crept into the psyche of everyone from college freshmen to mid-career executives.
The subtext is hard to miss: if you haven't shipped something by 25, you're already behind. If you're not racing toward something, you're falling behind. And with AI collapsing the barriers between idea and execution faster than ever, that pressure is only accelerating.
But here's what gets lost in that framing: when everything feels possible, urgency without intention becomes its own kind of trap. People move not from clarity, but from fear of missing out. They chase outcomes rather than build with conviction. And when urgency overrides intention, the work shows it.
This dynamic doesn't just apply to startups. It shows up in creative work too. If a musician starts by trying to go viral, or a writer begins with the goal of a bestseller, they've already left the deep emotional center that produces the most resonant work. They're creating from anticipation and performance. And that's rarely where the best art comes from.
Writing from the inside out
When I started writing poetry, I was a college freshman. I didn't have an audience in mind. I was absorbing the voices that moved me—Claudia Rankine, Ocean Vuong—and letting their language stir something in me I didn't yet have words for. I wanted to articulate my own emotions, to shape memories into quiet forms that helped me make sense of the world.
Years later, when I began compiling the poems that became Beautifully Confusing, I still wasn't thinking about publishing. For six to twelve months, I wrote purely as an outlet—to reflect, to understand myself. The pieces weren't crafted for applause. They were mine: raw, honest, private. Sharing them eventually felt like handing someone the keys to a locked diary.
But when I did, something unexpected happened: people saw themselves in it. They felt the honesty. They resonated not because the work was perfect, but because it was real.
The work that resonates—the work that lasts—isn't rushed. It's not manufactured for the outcome. It's created because something inside you had to be said. And that reason alone is enough.
The value of detours
Sometimes, the path to clarity isn't a straight line. It's a forced departure from one. A pause you didn't choose, or a step sideways that doesn't fit the plan you had for yourself.
Detours work in both directions. Sometimes the time away gives you clarity that you're on the right path, just approaching it from the wrong angle. Other times, it reveals that what you were chasing was never really yours to begin with—and that it's time to chart a different course entirely.
Either way, you win. A detour lifts your head from the day-to-day long enough to see the forest from the trees. It forces the question: are the reasons I started still the reasons to continue? That level of reflection—uncomfortable as it is—might be the only thing keeping you from staying on the wrong road too long.
When to move
Urgency, then, is most powerful when applied to discovery: to learning, listening, stress-testing assumptions, and accumulating leverage—intellectual, relational, creative. Use urgency to gather the material. Use clarity to determine what to build with it.
Because urgency without clarity is how exceptional people waste their shot at something only they could do—too high-urgency to wait for the right thing, too impatient to do the deep work that makes execution feel inevitable.
There is no shame in the in-between. It's not stalling—it's incubation. The liminal space is where you gather the scaffolding for what will eventually look obvious to the outside world, but only because you held the tension long enough to make it real.
When clarity hits, you won't need to force the urgency. It will be waiting for you—refined, focused, and ready.















